Brownfield Briefing
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise or Sponsor
  • Newsletters
  • Login
  • Register

 

Receive free alerts on RSS
  • Home
  • News
  • Land &
    Regions
  • Business
    Focus
  • Regulations &
    Policy
  • Technology
    Focus
  • Jobs &
    Careers
  • Events &
    Publications
You are here : Home › News › Remote “eco village” rejected on transport and sustainability grounds
Thursday, 9th September 2010

Browse news

  • Land and Regions
  • Business Focus
  • Regulation and Policy
  • Legal
  • Careers and benefits
  • Events and Publications
  • Policy updates and information
  • Technology Focus
  • Comment

Related content

  • Further eco sprawl plus planning changes announced
  • Oxford’s core strategy battle goes on
  • MPs want less South East brownfield emphasis
  • No specific “eco quarter” guidance planned
  • DCLG retreats on Oxford sprawl after legal challenge
  • Eco towns get another critical review
  • High Court cuts sprawl instruction from RSS
  • Long Marston takes longer
  • Car-dependent greenfield sites announced for “eco towns”
  • “Eco town” critics expose sites’ unsustainable features

Remote “eco village” rejected on transport and sustainability grounds

The communities secretary has accepted a planning inspector's recommendation.

Full text available to subscribers only. If you would like to subscribe or take out a trial click here

If you are having trouble logging in or think you are seeing this message in error, click here

Comments: 0
Posted : Monday 28 September 2009
  • Login or register to post comments
  • Email this page
  • Printer-friendly version
Site map
  • About Us
  • Work for us
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Copyright
  • Accessibility
  • Useful Links
  • Glossary
  • Using this site
  • Newzeye Portfolio
  • Sustainable Building
  • Property Forecast
  • Newzeye Services
  • Contract Publishing
Sift Unity